EDUC 522 Week 7: Individual and Organizational Accountability
The capacity of the K-16 education
system to adapt to a complex and turbulent external environment requires the reconceptualization
of faculty, teacher, and leadership roles.
Accordingly, institutions of higher education and schools face two challenges:
(1) the creation of performance and productivity standards that are aligned with
the changing purposes, roles, and expectations of K-12 and postsecondary education
and (2) the creation of a system of rewards and incentives that will motivate faculty
members, teachers, and administrators to develop new practices.
Unit
learning goals
When you finish this unit you will
have learned to:
1. Develop strategies to align institutional
purposes with individual practices.
2. Differentiate among different types
of reward systems.
3. View reward systems through the lens
of professional cultures.
4. Argue the advantages and disadvantages
of performance-based pay.
Questions
to answer before class as you complete your reading assignment:
1. What are the underlying assumptions
about individual motivation in performance-based reward systems?
2. What objections might faculty members
and teachers have to performance-based reward systems?
How does the faculty or
teacher evaluation system in your campus or school compare to the models presented
in the readings?
Class ppt.
Corts, K.
S. (2007). Teams versus individual accountability: Solving multitask problems through
job design. The RAND Journal of Economics, 38(2), 467–479.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. (2007).
The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational
Psychology Review, 19(1), 15–29.
Marsh,
J., Springer, M., McCaffrey, D., Yuan, K., Epstein,
S., Koppich, J., Kalra, N., DiMartino, C., Peng, A.
(2011) A Big Apple for Educators: New York City's Experiment with Schoolwide Performance Bonuses: Final Evaluation
Report. Rand Corporation, http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1114.html
(Summary p. 1-20)
Milanowski, A. T., Kimball, S. M., & Odden, A. (2005). Teacher accountability measures and links
to learning. In L. Steifel, A. E. Schwartz, R. Rubenstein, & J. Zabel (Eds.),
Measuring school performance and efficiency:
Implications for practice and research (2005 American Education Finance Association
yearbook) (pp. 137–162). New York: Taylor & Francis