hillkm.com


  • Home
  • EDL: TAY
  • Resources
  • EDUC 522
  • EDUC 523
  • EDUC 524
  • EDUC 525
  • EDUC 532
  • EDUC 536
  • EDUC 605
  • EDUC 620
  • EDUC 712
  • EDUC 713
  • EDUC 714
  • EDUC 715
  • EDUC 790
  • EDUC 792-4
  • EdD Program
  • Latin
  • Contact
  • SPSS & Tutorial Videos
  • CV

EDUC 523 Week 10: Language (8)



UNIT 8. LANGUAGE To say there is an achievement gap between English-language learners (ELLs) and non-ELLs, when tested in English, is to restate the obvious but tells us little about their long-term achievements. Anecdotally, we can say with some confidence that ELLs experience many of the academic difficulties that other language-minority groups do. But there are few hard data to rely on. While English proficiency tests are more meaningful than academic assessments in English, they are still not helpful since ELLs vary considerably in their initial level of English and in their pace of acquisition. And what is the relationship between SES, ELL status, and academic outcomes? Educators’ and employers’ misunderstandings about language acquisition and second-language learning have had a negative influence on academic achievement, job placement, and career success for language-minority individuals. New theories on language acquisition and secondlanguage learning provide new insights for school practices and hold potential for improving academic achievement and career success for presently underserved student populations. These new theories have led to new trends in research and new frameworks for classroom practices and employment situations.Learning Goals: 1. Describe trends in the research on bilingual education. 2. Explain the relationship between language acquisition, academic achievement, and career success. 3. Identify and provide an analysis of demographic factors that influence schooling for students from diverse cultural, linguistic, and experiential backgrounds. 4. Describe the challenges faced by language-minority individuals and their instructors and employers when language-minority individuals enter an institution with limited English proficiency. Key Questions: 1. Why is it so important to some communities that English be the only language for business, instruction, etc? 2. What is the relationship between language proficiency and test performance? 3. What does the research say is optimal for facilitating learning for English-language learners? Do the approaches change depending on the age of the learner (i.e., child vs. adult)? 4. What kind of diversity is there among English-language learners? Why does language become the defining characteristic?


Castania, K. (2003). The evolving language of diversity (Cornell Cooperative Extension publication). Retrieved from http://www.isr.umich.edu/home/diversity/resources/diversitylanguage.pdf Rodríguez, C. M. (2006). Language diversity in the workplace. Northwestern University Law Review, 100(4) (NYU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 06-35). Sidnell, J., & Enfield, N. J. (2012). Language diversity and social action. Current Anthropology, 53(3), 302–333 Gee, J. P. (2008). Discourses and literacies. In J. P. Gee, Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York: Routledge

Kenneth Martin Hill


[email protected]